Don’t Stop

Well that was pretty good, wasn’t it? I don’t think even the most ardent optimist could have predicted that set of results during Michael Carrick’s first month in charge. I mean, we could all see that Amorim’s favoured 5-3-2 wasn’t exactly working but I didn’t quite grasp the extent to which it was actively holding us back. I know it’s early days and I’m not getting carried away yadda yadda but basically everything is sorted now. Even if we don’t win the league this year we’re definitely winning it next season.

Obviously I’m not being entirely serious here but credit where credit’s due, given the absolute dross served up in recent times it’s been quite the turnaround. We’ve played some lovely stuff over the last few games featuring some scarcely believable passages of play from the same group of players who’ve been unable to string 3 passes together for much of the last 18 months. Whereas previously they looked tentative and passive, they now appear hungry and confident. This is more like it, lads.

There’s been a few parallels drawn with the similarly feelgood start to Solskjaer’s time in charge during the winter of 2018/19. United won 8 on the bounce and 14 of his first 19 games in charge prompting Woodward to hand him a 3 year contract. Form then nosedived completely and we won 2 of the next 10, missing out on a CL spot that should have been achieved comfortably. Needless to say, it is vital that the club avoids making a similar judgement on Carrick now. Yes, it’s all very encouraging but let’s see how the season plays out before making any kind of decision.

That’s not to say I wouldn’t want to see him given the job full-time. If this kind of form continues for the remainder of the season he’ll rightly be seen as a very strong candidate. Out of all the names mentioned there’s only Ancelotti who I’d feel confident in and he’s already kiboshed the idea saying he’d only consider Real Madrid after his stint in Brazil comes to an end. If the other contenders are limited to the bloke from Crystal Palace and the bloke just sacked by Spurs then I expect Carrick has a great chance irrespective of what happens from now until May.

Football punditry continues to get worse year by year, mainly due to the need to fill hour after hour of non-stop coverage on multiple platforms. I thought we’d reached saturation point when Sky Sports News became a thing, but it’s even worse now due to the fan cam crowd and already over-exposed faces like Neville and Keane now having their own YouTube channel or whatever it is. I don’t actively seek out any of this content but it’s still everywhere because even if you don’t watch it you’re force-fed clips on social media or their latest nonsense makes the next day’s headlines. It’s exhausting.

Arsenal are currently getting it from all angles just because the media decided to crown them PL champions back in October. This wasn’t based on anything other than City had a bad start and Liverpool’s form dropped off a cliff. Now to clarify, I don’t like Arsenal but compared to City and Liverpool I really don’t mind them that much. I don’t like their manager, their knobhead internet fans (same as every other club) and I don’t like them fouling goalkeepers at corners. I do find the reaction to their current sticky patch to be pretty pathetic, however.

The PL is a genuine test of endurance and given the level of competition, winning it is incredibly difficult. Truth be told, Arsenal don’t look anything like the team they were a couple of years ago. Literally everyone in my circle has agreed for months that they still expect City to win it – it didn’t take a genius to predict they would improve after Christmas and Arsenal’s nerves would kick in as the run-in approached. Nevertheless, the media consensus was that it was basically a one-horse race and they were going to walk it.

So now there’s a tedious pile-on since the cracks are starting to show and their lead has been reduced to 2 points. You expect this level of discourse from Goldbridge-level bantz merchants but now it’s all over the mainstream media too. I’m honestly sick of it and it genuinely impedes on my enjoyment of the sport. I get more nuance and perspective talking to mates in the pub than I do from any talking head on Sky Sports filling another 30 mins of mind-numbingly banal content. I’ve honestly reached the stage where I don’t wish to hear Gary Neville utter a single word on any subject for the rest of my life.

Another one who needs to stop talking is Jim Ratcliffe, who continues to show he’s a genuinely terrible person each time he opens his mouth. It’s not exactly a shock to learn that a 73 year old billionaire holds some Enoch Powell-esque political opinions, but most of those operating in the public eye at least have the good grace to keep them under wraps. Monaco-dwelling Jim is proving himself a massive hypocrite and is in a major strop because his business is struggling and UK industry isn’t thriving post-Brexit as he predicted.

Ratcliffe may well have valid grievances with the government about Net Zero and its effect on the chemicals sector, but using talk of colonialism as a stick to strike back at them is incredibly snide and disingenuous. The Britain First march in Manchester last weekend serves as a reminder how the far right are quick to capitalise whenever the subject of immigration hits the headlines. Whether that was his intention or not, public figures like Ratcliffe espousing broadly similar views plays directly into their hands and provides further oxygen for their narrative.

If any other club representative had expressed similar sentiments it would likely have resulted in a reprimand and disciplinary action given the current climate of football club’s promoting diversity and inclusivity at every opportunity. It’s easy to scoff at ‘wokeist’ initiatives and how they’ve become almost obligatory for pretty much every organisation existing in modern Britain. Ratcliffe’s comments give a clue as to precisely why they’re necessary.

rednews.bigcartel.com

Round & Round

Leave a reply

Although Amorim’s sacking didn’t exactly come as a shock (formerly seismic events like managerial changes are relatively commonplace at United these days), until his mini meltdown following the draw at Leeds I honestly thought there were tentative signs he was finally getting somewhere. Although punctuated by several demoralising home draws against PL strugglers, we’ve only actually lost twice in the 14 league games since the start of October. So no, I didn’t really see this one coming.

One can only assume that despite unease behind the scenes at the perceived lack of progress, things only escalated once he started throwing out thinly-veiled digs in front of the media. I can sort-of see the rationale since both performances and results still left a lot to be desired, I just don’t quite understand the timing or what we’re gaining by dismissing him now. Fletcher taking charge prior to another caretaker before a full time appointment at the end of the season, is it? Months of mindless speculation as to the identity of the new leading man for the never-ending Man United soap opera. Marvellous – that’s just what we need.

I can’t really accept the idea that making a change now improves the chances of European football either. I never felt confident that Amorim was the man long-term but giving him until the end of the season rather than messing about with further interim appointments would have made more sense. By all means, privately decide he’s toast and seek out a successor now but making another mid-season change strikes me as bafflingly ill-advised. We’ve been here before and it only piles on the pressure and invites further media scrutiny.

You can’t appoint a man to undertake a 4 year job on a limited budget and then sack him after 14 months. Rightly or wrongly, he was stubbornly bound to his 3-4-3 but surely that was part of his appeal to start with? He was supposedly the Ineos candidate, the best in class and would receive unwavering support from the club hierarchy. Are they that thin-skinned that all it took to change that was a couple of mildly inflammatory remarks in a press conference? I thought adopting a definitive system was part of the plan as opposed to pursuing vague notions like ‘club DNA’ and ‘the United way’.

Which brings us to the potential appointment of Ole Gunnar Solskjaer as interim manager from now until the end of the season. Honestly, I’m speechless that the idea is even being contemplated given his previous stint as vibes controller from 2018 to 2021. The malignant influences in the dressing room were given free rein to run riot during that time as Ole set out to “put a smile back on peoples’ faces” following the tumultuous last few months of Mourinho’s tenure. Certain people must have very short memories if they can’t recall how bad that period was.

After Ten Hag left I can recall saying here it was imperative we ended the cycle of hiring and firing managers every 18 months. Even with unlimited funds it’s almost an impossible task to dismantle and re-build a squad capable of challenging for the title within such a period. If it’s true the likes of Wilcox and Ratcliffe were trying to impose their own ideas on formations and tactics then Amorim had every right to start kicking off. He was unequivocal about the way he was going to play from day one so I’d suggest any fault lies with the Ineos crew for appointing him in the first place.

Amorim’s reign will rightly be remembered for the poor football and abysmal win ratio but I’ll maintain he did some sterling work in weeding out the dickhead contingent. He binned Rashford, Sancho and Garnacho as well jettisoning expensive Ten Hag flops like Onana and Antony. Both the wage bill and the player’s sense of entitlement was reset completely within a few months of him taking over and despite not getting results, at least we’ve re-gained the sense of being a semi-serious football team. I can’t recall any instances of the players wandering round and appearing not to give a shit over the last few months.

Whoever does come in needs to impose themselves quickly or there’s a risk of the freshly-installed sense of discipline evaporating. Mainoo recovering from injury at the precise moment Amorim departed could have been mere coincidence but looked highly suspicious. His brother and sister could do with winding their necks in too – courting likes and attention from fawning idiots on social media. Your brother hasn’t been imprisoned here, he’s a 20 year old kid on the fringes of the Man United team. If you think such a ‘plight’ is somehow unjust then he’s welcome to try his luck at another club – see how that affects your follower count.

Even Bruno was at it just before Christmas, grizzling to Canal 11, a Portuguese Football Federation-owned channel that the club “wanted me to leave” during the summer. Quite why he chose to go public with this now is a mystery, but even more astonishing is the level of self-delusion on display. Bruno mate, of course they wanted you to leave when your Saudi suitors were promising a £100M cheque in return. You were the club’s most sellable asset in transfer window where they desperately needed to recoup funds and were a billion pounds in debt.

I’m not sure why he’s harbouring any resentment because it looks like they simply put the offer on the table and said “it’s entirely up to you”. He’s lucky he was even consulted as I’m certain any other club in United’s position would have ushered him out of the door irrespective of his own thoughts on the matter. Bruno has put in a great shift as a United player and will be remembered fondly once he’s left, but let’s have it right – he’s also been highly remunerated too. Don’t be banging on about loyalty when your employers have just made 400+ redundancies whilst you’re still trousering £15M a year.

What’s now certain is that any lingering hopes of the Ineos management team proving themselves more capable than Woodward and Arnold have now been extinguished. Indeed, the current bunch seems more dysfunctional than ever given that Berrada, Wilcox and Ratcliffe still require ultimate sign-off from the Glazer lair in Florida. Given that both Ashworth and Brailsford have left the club since the last time they were recruiting a manager, I suppose there’s a slightly improved chance of everyone being in full agreement this time out. They have to get this next decision right. (Spoiler alert: they probably won’t.)

rednews.bigcartel.com

Is This It

Leave a reply

I’m reluctant to use the word ‘progress’ but there are signs afoot that we might finally be getting somewhere. 5 league games unbeaten isn’t exactly a milestone to be celebrated but putting all cynicism aside, it’s the first time it’s occurred since February 2024. When the team loses its innate ability to suffer a collective meltdown once a game I might truly start believing things are changing. Until that occurs and for the moment at least, it’s a step in the right direction

I’m becoming more and more convinced that a number of our problems are self-made. In a season where we’re only playing once a week, I’m not sure why Amorim persists with this habit of making defensive changes at around the 70 minute mark. If these were purely down to injuries like the recent Spurs game then fair enough – but half the time these occur for no discernible reason. Despite the recent improvement, the team remains very fragile and it doesn’t take much for things to quickly unravel. I’d be far more confident if the manager decided on his preferred back 3 and stuck with them wherever possible.

The single biggest change that’s affected our fortunes over the last month has to be the emergence of Senne Lammens. He deserves immense credit for stepping into the starting keeper’s berth with zero fuss and looks totally unfazed by his new surroundings. Bigger names than him have shrivelled in the spotlight when given the opportunity, so it’s very encouraging he’s made such an assured start to his United career. Given the fact he’s already proved he can handle Anfield on a Sunday afternoon, I’m fairly confident we might have fixed one of our biggest problems.

When I wrote last time I was genuinely concerned for Amorim’s future and doubted if he’d even reach November. The Chelsea and Liverpool results together with the current mini unbeaten run have probably bought him more time as well as regaining the support of a sizeable number of fans who were previously wavering. There weren’t many left in my circle with anything positive to say about him after the defeat at Brentford – a terrible performance that followed a similarly listless display at the Etihad where City barely had to get out of 2nd gear.

The Liverpool game was a huge result for both the team and the manager. It was a long time since we’d won there and they’ve given us a few maulings in recent years. They certainly don’t look the force they’ve been in recent seasons now the hangover from Klopp’s departure has finally kicked in 12 months later than anticipated. Nevertheless, we looked competitive and there was clear evidence of a plan in place. Cunha was absolutely terrific holding the ball up during the 2nd half – what a difference having a player like that as an outlet as opposed to the likes of Rashford or Garnacho.

The challenge now is to prove that this current run of form isn’t just a blip and to keep it going. Looking at the upcoming fixtures, this could be doable. Villa away and Newcastle at home over Christmas are the only moderately tough games we have until we face City mid-January. The rest look very winnable on paper, though these are precisely the type of routine games in which we’ve struggled over recent years. If we can string a few more wins together then a top 5 finish and European qualification should become an achievable goal – something that looked a distant prospect when the season began so poorly.

Whereas fortunes on the pitch might be improving, everything else about the club continues to disappoint. It’s now 12 months since the announcement of the stadium no sane person actually wants and the project’s progress is predictably slow. The latest survey was an absolute belter, containing the most rudimentarily stupid set of questions about ticket prices and seat locations. Q7. ‘Would you be interested in buying a ST costing £3000 situated in row 700?’ Errr… no. Q8. ‘Would you be interested in buying a ST costing £3000 situated next to the dugout?’ Again… no. Q9. ‘Would you be interested in buying a ST costing £500, 20 rows up behind the goal?’ Obviously… yes.

I’m not sure how they intend to extrapolate any meaningful data from this nonsense other than ‘the idiot proles desire sensibly-priced tickets close to the pitch’. It’s a completely pointless exercise in the guise of ‘fan engagement’ that’ll be used to justify a steep increase in ST prices when the move eventually does occur. It’s blindingly obvious now what happen – any tickets within a few feet of the pitch will cost an absolute fortune and if want a ST for less than a grand, brace yourself for several flights of stairs (possibly escalator rides provided they’re still within budget).

The 5 year timeline that Ratcliffe mentioned previously continues to look incredibly optimistic. Andy Burnham appeared on a podcast recently saying that the train line running adjacent to the ground will need to be moved and could end up “nearer Lou Macari’s chippy”. Completing an infrastructure project of that scale within the next 4 years would be some feat, never mind building a new stadium from scratch. Even if they managed to purchase the land required tomorrow I reckon you’re looking at another decade at least before we’re even close to leaving OT.

The ticket office remain fixated on doing their utmost to make life as difficult as possible for supporters. Anecdotally at least, success rates for away tickets have reached an all-time low – yet there’s no way of actually proving this following their decision to stop publishing details of application numbers and % splits across the different pots. Plenty I know in the standard pot have had nothing all season despite applying for every game – yet entirely coincidentally, instances of groups of a dozen tourists appearing in away ends appear to be on the rise.

Even if you are fortunate enough to receive a ticket, it doesn’t necessarily mean you’re going to see the game. At Spurs recently, some tickets were being scanned red which meant the holder had to visit the TO and verify their identity with ID. There were other reports of people being stopped at the turnstile and made to close and re-open the app to check that they were the original recipient and holder. You might read this and think ‘what’s the problem?’, but it all amounts to a gross abuse of privilege and the club wildly overstepping the mark in terms of what’s actually legal.

As I’ve said previously, the claim that these measures are in place to combat touting is highly dubious as tickets for away games continue to be traded online for eye-watering sums. I’m more inclined to suggest it’s part of a campaign to target regular fans and dish out sanctions if any minor transgression of their ‘rules and regulations’ can be proven. A word of advice, if anyone purporting to be a club employee approaches you at the turnstile of an away ground and demands to see your phone, wander off and return 5 minutes later when their attention is elsewhere. Either that or just tell them to sling it.

rednews.bigcartel.com